Typically the unmarked verb is used for either the timeless habitual or the stative aspect or the past perfective tense–aspect combination. Tense, aspect, and mood are usually indicated with separate invariant pre-verbal auxiliaries. Some analytic languages such as creole languages have separate grammatical markers for tense, aspect, and/or mood, which comes close to the theoretical distinction.Ĭreoles, both Atlantic and non-Atlantic, tend to share a large number of syntactic features, including the avoidance of bound morphemes. However, not all languages conflate tense, aspect and mood. In Ancient Greek, the perfect tense ( Ancient Greek: χρόνος παρακείμενος, romanized: khrónos parakeímenos) is a set of forms that express both present tense and perfect aspect (finite forms), or simply perfect aspect (non-finite forms). In Spanish, the simple conditional ( Spanish: condicional simple) is classified as one of the simple tenses ( Spanish: tiempos simples), but is named for the mood (conditional) that it expresses. In the traditional grammatical description of some languages, including English, many Romance languages, and Greek and Latin, "tense" or the equivalent term in that language refers to a set of inflected or periphrastic verb forms that express a combination of tense, aspect, and mood. Other languages with distinct past imperfectives include Latin and Persian. In some languages, such as Spanish and Modern Greek, the imperfective aspect is fused with the past tense in a form traditionally called the imperfect. In other cases, there may not be delineated categories of tense and mood, or aspect and mood.įor instance, many Indo-European languages do not clearly distinguish tense from aspect. On the other hand, the same category may be expressed with multiple constructions. However, this system may not be complete in that not all possible combinations may have an available construction. Several features (or categories) may be conveyed by a single grammatical construction (for instance, English -s is used for the third person singular present). The term was coined out of convenience, for it is often difficult to untangle these features of a language. Therefore, some authors extend this term as tense–aspect–mood–evidentiality ( tame in short). In some languages, evidentiality (whether evidence exists for the statement, and if so what kind) and mirativity (surprise) may also be included. In the last example, there is no difference in the articulation of the word, although it is being used in a different way, one for conveying information, the other for instructing. Mood: I can walk (possibility), Walk faster! (necessity).
Aspect: He walk ed (unitary), He was walk ing (continuous), He used to walk (repeated).Tense: He walk ed (past), He walk s (present), He will walk (future).
0 kommentar(er)
